STEPHEN B. GEBELOFF, P.A.
A DEBT COLLECTION LAW FIRM
Do
not give up on your
Our
Many
Call us to discuss your South Florida Collection matters with Stephen Gebeloff, Esq. a South Florida Collection Attorney. Mr. Gebeloff will tailor a Collection Strategy that is just right for you. If you have collection matters in other jurisdictions, Mr. Gebeloff will be able to assist you in helping you choose the proper collection professional for your collection accounts outside of
Mr. Gebeloff is an experienced litigator whose primary
areas of practice are commercial law, creditors’ rights and
construction law. He has represented clients from the banking,
insurance, advertising, manufacturing, transportation, leasing,
telecommunications and service industries. He has extensive experience
prosecuting officers, directors and members of entities for fraudulent
transfers of assets. He has represented developers, property owners,
contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers and design
professionals in all facets of construction law.
Weiner, Aronson & Mankoff, PA provides collection attorney services for these Florida Cities:
Alachua Altamonte Springs Apalachicola Apopka Arcadia Atlantic Beach Auburndale Avon Park
Bartow Belle Glade Belleview Beverly Hills Big Pine Key Blountstown Boca Raton Bonifay Bonita Springs Boynton Beach Bradenton Brandon Brooksville Bunnell Bushnell
Callahan Cantonment Cape Canaveral Cape Coral Casselberry Chiefland Chipley Clearwater Clermont Clewiston Cocoa Cocoa Beach Crawfordville Crestview Crystal River
Dade City Dania Daytona Beach Debary Deerfield Beach Defuniak Springs Deland Delray Beach Deltona Destin Dunedin Dunnellon
Eastpoint Edgewater Eglin AFB Englewood Estero Eustis
Fernandina Beach Flagler Beach Fort Lauderdale Fort Myers Fort Myers Beach Fort Pierce Fort Walton Beach
Gainesville Green Cove Springs Groveland Gulf Breeze
Haines City Hallandale Havana Hernando Hialeah High Springs Hobe Sound Holiday Hollywood Homestead Homosassa Hudson
Immokalee Indialantic Indiantown Inverness Islamorada
Jacksonville Jacksonville Beach Jensen Beach Jupiter
Key Biscayne Key Largo Key West Keystone Heights Kissimmee
Labelle Lady Lake Lake City Lake Mary Lake Placid Lake Wales Lake Worth Lakeland Land O Lakes Largo Lecanto Leesburg Lehigh Acres Live Oak Longboat Key Longwood Loxahatchee Lutz Lynn Haven
MacClenny Madison Maitland Marathon Marco Island Marianna Mary Esther Melbourne Merritt Island Miami Miami Beach Middleburg Milton Monticello Mount Dora Mulberry
Naples Navarre New Port Richey New Smyrna Beach Newberry Niceville North Fort Myers North Miami Beach North Palm Beach North Port
Ocala Ocoee Okeechobee Oldsmar Opa Locka Orange City Orange Park Orlando Ormond Beach Oviedo
Palatka Palm Bay Palm Beach Palm City Palm Coast Palm Harbor Palmetto Panama City Panama City Beach Pensacola Perry Pinellas Park Plant City Pompano Beach Ponte Vedra Beach Port Charlotte Port Richey Port Saint Joe Port Saint Lucie Punta Gorda
Quincy
Riverview Rockledge Ruskin
Safety Harbor Saint Augustine Saint Cloud Saint Petersburg Sanford Sanibel Santa Rosa Beach Sarasota Satellite Beach Sebastian Sebring Seminole Shalimar Spring Hill Starke Stuart Summerfield Summerland Key
Tallahassee Tampa Tarpon Springs Tavares Tavernier Titusville Trenton
Umatilla
Valparaiso Valrico Venice Vero Beach
Wauchula West Palm Beach Weston Wildwood Williston Windermere Winter Garden Winter Haven Winter Park Winter Springs
Yulee
Zephyrhills
Under UFTA, a transfer made or obligation
incurred by a debtor is fraudulent if done:
a.
With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor; or
b.
Without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or
obligation, and the debtor:
(1)
Was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the
remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the
business or transaction; or
(2)
Intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that the
debtor would incur debts beyond the debtor's ability to pay as they become due.
Those
standards apply regardless of whether the creditors claim arose before or after
the transfer were made or the obligation was incurred.
In
determining actual intent, consideration may be given, among other factors, to
whether:
* The
transfer or obligation was to an insider;
* The
debtor retained possession or control of the property transferred after the
transfer;
* The
transfer or obligation was disclosed or concealed;
*
Before the transfer was made or obligation was incurred, the debtor had been sued or threatened with suit;
* The
transfer was of substantially all the debtor's assets;
* The
debtor absconded;
* The
debtor removed or concealed assets;
* The
value of the consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to
the value of the asset transferred or the amount of the obligation incurred;
* The
debtor was insolvent or became insolvent shortly after the transfer was made or
the obligation was incurred;
* The
transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was
incurred; and
* The
debtor transferred the essential assets of the business to a lienor who
transferred the assets to an insider of the debtor.
The
remedies available to a successful claimant under UFTA are broad. Obviously,
avoidance of the transfer is primary.
Other
remedies include attachment against the asset transferred or other property of
the transferee; a money judgment against the transferee where the transfer
cannot be undone; and injunctive relief. The statute also contains a catch-all
provision, affording a creditor "any other relief the circumstances may
require."